London, 28 November 2012 -- Moody's Investors Service today assigned a provisional (P)A3 rating to the proposed issuance of US dollar-denominated notes by Abu Dhabi National Energy Company PJSC (TAQA). The (P)A3 rating relates to both Series A and B notes. The Series A and B notes will differ in maturities, but materially have identical terms and conditions.

RATINGS RATIONALE

"The notes will be direct and unsecured obligations of TAQA and will rank pari passu with the company's other present and future unsecured and unsubordinated obligations," says Martin Kohlhase, a Moody's Vice President - Senior Analyst and lead analyst for TAQA. "Hence, we have aligned the provisional rating with TAQA's issuer rating of A3."

The terms of conditions regarding the status and covenants of the notes mirror those of TAQA's (P)A3-rated $9 billion global medium-term note (GMTN) programme. Moody's understands that TAQA intends to use proceeds of the issuance for general corporate purposes, including the repayment of outstanding debt. According to its interim condensed consolidated financial statements per 30 September 2012, TAQA had current financial liabilities of AED9.418 billion (approximately $2.6 billion).

Moody's rates TAQA according to its rating methodology for government-related issuers (GRIs) given the company's strong links to the government. These links are evident through (1) the government's ownership of TAQA; (2) the government's representation on the company's board; (3) TAQA's mandate as the de facto sole public utility provider in Abu Dhabi; and (4) the favourable regulatory regime for utilities in the Emirate. As a GRI, TAQA's fundamental credit profile (or Baseline Credit Assessment) of ba1 receives an uplift of four notches to A3, reflecting Moody's assumption of high support.

WHAT COULD CHANGE THE RATING UP/DOWN

What Could Change the Rating - Up

While improving metrics may create upwards pressure on the BCA, that could be offset by continuing exposure to higher risk business sectors - it is difficult to offer prescriptive guidance when TAQA's strategic direction is not static, with it having signalled a more conservative approach to future international ambitions, yet with some continuing interest in expanding its power generation portfolio. Any acquisitions are assumed to be modest and complementary to its existing business.

Nevertheless, upgrade pressure on the BCA could occur should TAQA's financial profile exhibit the following characteristics on a sustained basis, consistent with investment grade expectations for a rating at the low end of the Baa-range:

- Debt to capitalisation significantly below 80%.

- Funds from operations (FFO) to interest expense of at least 2.5 times.

- FFO to debt trending towards 10%.

- Positive (RCF - capex) / debt ratio.

- Starting to generate some headroom within the financial metrics of the domestic business rather than maximising debt capacity as at present.

The guidance above is predicated on TAQA continuing to refocus its business mainly towards the low risk domestic sector; while debt to capitalisation has improved modestly, it is still weaker than when TAQA's BCA was last in the Baa-range, when the risk profile was more that of a purely domestic business.

We would also expect a continuation of its refinancing track record and the maintenance of a solid liquidity profile.

What Could Change the Rating - Down

- Although very unlikely, any changes in the regulation and oversight of TAQA's domestic operations or changes in the ownership structure could result in downward pressure on the BCA and the final rating and the lowering the government support assumptions currently viewed as high.

- Sustained lower oil prices of below $80/barrel could reverse the improving trend in the financial profile and thereby could result in pressure developing on the BCA and the final A3 ratings were debt/capitalisation to trend towards 85%, FFO/interest expense trend towards below 2 times, FFO/debt trend towards 5%, or sustained negative (RCF - capex)/debt.

- Pursuit of an aggressive or large scale acquisition strategy.

PRINCIPAL METHODOLOGY

The principal methodology used in rating Abu Dhabi National Energy Company PJSC (TAQA) was the Government-Related Issuers: Methodology Update published in July 2010. Please see the Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology.

Abu Dhabi National Energy Company PJSC (TAQA), headquartered in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (UAE), owns, invests in and operates companies in the fields of power generation, water desalination as well as oil and gas (O&G), which encompasses exploration and production, storage and pipelines. The company carries out these activities across the UAE and neighbouring countries in the Middle East, North America, Europe, Africa and the Indian subcontinent.

TAQA is indirectly 51%-owned by the government of Abu Dhabi (Aa2 stable), with the remaining shareholding split between the Farmers' Fund in Abu Dhabi (21%) and a free float of 28%, albeit this is limited to Emirati nationals. For the financial year 2011, TAQA reported total revenues of AED24.2 billion ($6.6 billion; +13% against 2010), net debt/capital of 77.6% (78.0%) and net debt/EBITDA of 5.0x (6.5x).

REGULATORY DISCLOSURES

For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.

The rating has been disclosed to the rated entity or its designated agent(s) and issued with no amendment resulting from that disclosure.

Information sources used to prepare the rating are the following : parties involved in the ratings, public information, and confidential and proprietary Moody's Investors Service information.

Moody's considers the quality of information available on the rated entity, obligation or credit satisfactory for the purposes of issuing a rating.

Moody's adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a rating is of sufficient quality and from sources Moody's considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, Moody's is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process.

Moody's Investors Service may have provided Ancillary or Other Permissible Service(s) to the rated entity or its related third parties within the two years preceding the credit rating action. Please see the special report "Ancillary or other permissible services provided to entities rated by MIS's EU credit rating agencies" on the ratings disclosure page on our website www.moodys.com for further information.

Please see the ratings disclosure page on www.moodys.com for general disclosure on potential conflicts of interests.

Please see the ratings disclosure page on www.moodys.com for information on (A) MCO's major shareholders (above 5%) and for (B) further information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities as well as (C) the names of entities that hold ratings from MIS that have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%. A member of the board of directors of this rated entity may also be a member of the board of directors of a shareholder of Moody's Corporation; however, Moody's has not independently verified this matter.

Please see Moody's Rating Symbols and Definitions on the Rating Process page on www.moodys.com for further information on the meaning of each rating category and the definition of default and recovery.

Please see ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for the last rating action and the rating history.

The date on which some ratings were first released goes back to a time before Moody's ratings were fully digitized and accurate data may not be available. Consequently, Moody's provides a date that it believes is the most reliable and accurate based on the information that is available to it. Please see the ratings disclosure page on our website www.moodys.com for further information.

Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating.

Martin Kohlhase Vice President - Senior Analyst Corporate Finance Group Moody'sInvestors Services Limited, Dubai Branch Gate Precinct 3, Level 3 P.O. Box 506845 DIFC - DubaiUAE Telephone: 00971 4237 9536 David G. Staples MD - Corporate Finance Corporate Finance Group Telephone: 00971 4237 9536 Releasing Office: Moody's Investors Service Ltd. One Canada SquareCanary WharfLondon E14 5FA United Kingdom JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456 SUBSCRIBERS: 44 20 7772 5454 (C) 2012 Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and/or its licensors and affiliates (collectively, "MOODY'S"). All rights reserved.

CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. ("MIS") AND ITS AFFILIATES ARE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS PUBLISHED BY MOODY'S ("MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS") MAY INCLUDE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY'S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY'S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED,DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.

All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY'S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY'S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process. Under no circumstances shall MOODY'S have any liability to any person or entity for (a) any loss or damage in whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or relating to, any error negligent or otherwise or other circumstance or contingency within or outside the control of MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees or agents in connection with the procurement, collection, compilation, analysis, interpretation, communication, publication or delivery of any such information, or (b) any direct, indirect, special, consequential, compensatory or incidental damages whatsoever (including without limitation, lost profits), even if MOODY'S is advised in advance of the possibility of such damages, resulting from the use of or inability to use, any such information. The ratings, financial reporting analysis, projections, and other observations, if any, constituting part of the information contained herein are, and must be construed solely as, statements of opinion and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, sell or hold any securities. Each user of the information contained herein must make its own study and evaluation of each security it may consider purchasing, holding or selling.

NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY'S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.

MIS, a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Corporation ("MCO"), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MIS have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MIS for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS's ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading "Shareholder Relations -- Corporate Governance -- Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy."

Any publication into Australia of this document is by MOODY'S affiliate, Moody's Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657, which holds Australian Financial Services License no. 336969. This document is intended to be provided only to "wholesale clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY'S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a "wholesale client" and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to "retail clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, credit ratings assigned on and after October 1, 2010 by Moody's Japan K.K. ("MJKK") are MJKK's current opinions of the relative future credit risk of entities, credit commitments, or debt or debt-like securities. In such a case, "MIS" in the foregoing statements shall be deemed to be replaced with "MJKK". MJKK is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly owned by Moody's Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO.

This credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness or a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be dangerous for retail investors to make any investment decision based on this credit rating. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser.