New York, June 14, 2012 -- Moody's Investors Service confirmed Alta Mesa Holdings, LP's (Alta Mesa) B2 Corporate Family Rating (CFR) and B3 senior unsecured note rating. Moody's also assigned a SGL-3 Speculative Grade Liquidity rating reflecting adequate liquidity through mid-2013. The outlook is stable. This action concludes Moody's rating review, which commenced on April 2, 2012.
Issuer: ALTA MESA HOLDINGS, LP
..Confirmations:
.... Probability of Default Rating, Confirmed at B2
.... Corporate Family Rating, Confirmed at B2
....US$300M 9.625% Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Confirmed at B3
..Assignments:
.... Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Assigned SGL-3
..Outlook Actions:
....Outlook, Changed To Stable From Rating Under Review
RATINGS RATIONALE
"High oil prices, technological advances to onshore drilling and completion methods and Alta Mesa's focused development efforts in the oil and liquids-rich Weeks Island, Eagle Ford and Oklahoma regions are expected to improve the company's margins and cash flows through 2014," commented Sajjad Alam, Moody's analyst. "However, in achieving higher oil and overall production volumes, Alta Mesa will have to spend significant amounts of capital, develop new areas and execute a successful drilling campaign through 2013."
Low natural gas prices will continue to inhibit Alta Mesa's overall production volume. While the company's relatively low-risk oil projects may ultimately offset the declines in natural gas volumes, the transition from gas to oil will be gradual. The company's progression to a higher rating category would depend on its ability to substantially reach its oil growth targets and establishes a more sustainable production base.
The B2 CFR reflects Alta Mesa's small scale, high leverage, exposure to natural gas prices and execution risks associated with its liquids growth strategy. The rating is supported by its modestly diversified portfolio of developed properties with low geological risks and favorable finding and development (F&D) costs, its substantially hedged position, as well as by its significant growth prospects in liquids production in 2012 and beyond. The rating is negatively impacted by the limited partnership structure which provides Denham with a liquidity demand right that became effective in January 2012. A demand for liquidity would at a minimum distract management's focus, and could be provided through a recapitalization, an IPO, or liquidation of the partnership.
Alta Mesa plans to spend between $220 million and $240 million in 2012, mostly on oily assets. The core conventional South Louisiana assets will attract the most capital (currently produces ~33% oil), followed by the Eagle Ford, (~91% oil) and Oklahoma (~56% oil). Total expenditures at the Hilltop (formerly Deep Bossier) will be much smaller than historical levels and will target shallower oil zones (Austin Chalk and Woodbine formations) compared to the more gassy production that has been typical of the region. Alta Mesa is looking to exit 2012 with oil comprising over 40% of total production, up from roughly 22% in 2010. While natural gas will remain a substantial component of overall production, the company's substantial above-market price hedges should shelter margins through 2013.
Liquidity should be adequate through mid-2013, which is captured in the assigned SGL-3 rating. Alta Mesa's funds from operations, cash balance and revolver availability should sufficiently cover capital expenditures and working capital requirements through mid-2013. At March 31, 2012, the company had approximately $9 million of cash and as of May 15, 2012 had $118 million of availability on its $350 million borrowing base revolving credit facility. The borrowing base was re-determined in May 2012. The facility expires on May 23, 2016. The revolving credit facility has three financial covenants - a maximum debt to EBITDAX of 4.0x, a minimum EBITDAX to interest of 3.0x, and a minimum current ratio of 1.0x. There is ample headroom under the covenants and we expect full compliance through 2013. Substantially all of the partnership's assets are pledged as collateral for the revolving credit facility. As such, Alta Mesa's ability to raise alternate liquidity is limited.
The stable outlook reflects the repeatability of Alta Mesa's asset base, its substantially hedged future sales, and our expectation that the near-term growth in oil and NGL production will be funded principally with operating cash flow.
An upgrade would be considered if Alta Mesa can raise production above 20,000 boe per day through drilling success, lower debt to average daily production below $25,000 per boe and achieve a leveraged full-cycle ratio approaching 1.5x.
Alta Mesa's ratings could be downgraded if it assumes significant amount of debt to fund growth, acquisitions or distributions resulting in a debt to average daily production above $35,000 per boe.
The principal methodologies used in rating Alta Mesa were the Independent Exploration and Production Industry methodology published in December 2011, and the Loss Given Default for Speculative-Grade Non-Financial Companies in the U.S., Canada and EMEA, published in June 2009. Please see the Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com for a copy of these methodologies.
Alta Mesa Holdings, headquartered in Houston, Texas, is an independent E&P company with primary producing properties located South Louisiana, East Texas, Oklahoma, and the Eagle Ford Shale in South Texas.
REGULATORY DISCLOSURES
The Global Scale Credit Ratings on this press release that are issued by one of Moody's affiliates outside the EU are endorsed by Moody's Investors Service Ltd., One Canada Square, Canary Wharf, London E 14 5FA, UK, in accordance with Art.4 paragraph 3 of the Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 on Credit Rating Agencies. Further information on the EU endorsement status and on the Moody's office that has issued a particular Credit Rating is available on www.moodys.com.
For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.
Moody's considers the quality of information available on the rated entity, obligation or credit satisfactory for the purposes of issuing a rating.
Moody's adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a rating is of sufficient quality and from sources Moody's considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, Moody's is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process.
Please see Moody's Rating Symbols and Definitions on the Rating Process page on www.moodys.com for further information on the meaning of each rating category and the definition of default and recovery.
Please see ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for the last rating action and the rating history. The date on which some ratings were first released goes back to a time before Moody's ratings were fully digitized and accurate data may not be available. Consequently, Moody's provides a date that it believes is the most reliable and accurate based on the information that is available to it. Please see the ratings disclosure page on our website www.moodys.com for further information.
Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating.
Sajjad Alam Analyst Corporate Finance Group Moody'sInvestors Service, Inc.250 Greenwich StreetNew York, NY 10007 U.S.A. JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376 SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653Steven Wood MD - Corporate Finance Corporate Finance Group JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376 SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653 Releasing Office: Moody's Investors Service, Inc.250 Greenwich StreetNew York, NY 10007 U.S.A. JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376 SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653(C) 2012 Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and/or its licensors and affiliates (collectively, "MOODY'S"). All rights reserved.
CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. ("MIS") AND ITS AFFILIATES ARE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS PUBLISHED BY MOODY'S ("MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS") MAY INCLUDE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY'S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY'S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.
ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED,DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY'S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY'S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process. Under no circumstances shall MOODY'S have any liability to any person or entity for (a) any loss or damage in whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or relating to, any error negligent or otherwise or other circumstance or contingency within or outside the control of MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees or agents in connection with the procurement, collection, compilation, analysis, interpretation, communication, publication or delivery of any such information, or (b) any direct, indirect, special, consequential, compensatory or incidental damages whatsoever (including without limitation, lost profits), even if MOODY'S is advised in advance of the possibility of such damages, resulting from the use of or inability to use, any such information. The ratings, financial reporting analysis, projections, and other observations, if any, constituting part of the information contained herein are, and must be construed solely as, statements of opinion and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, sell or hold any securities. Each user of the information contained herein must make its own study and evaluation of each security it may consider purchasing, holding or selling.
NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY'S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.
MIS, a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Corporation ("MCO"), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MIS have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MIS for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS's ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading "Shareholder Relations -- Corporate Governance -- Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy."
Any publication into Australia of this document is by MOODY'S affiliate, Moody's Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657, which holds Australian Financial Services License no. 336969. This document is intended to be provided only to "wholesale clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY'S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a "wholesale client" and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to "retail clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, credit ratings assigned on and after October 1, 2010 by Moody's Japan K.K. ("MJKK") are MJKK's current opinions of the relative future credit risk of entities, credit commitments, or debt or debt-like securities. In such a case, "MIS" in the foregoing statements shall be deemed to be replaced with "MJKK". MJKK is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly owned by Moody's Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO.
This credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness or a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be dangerous for retail investors to make any investment decision based on this credit rating. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser.